Feature ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews
Inhibits growth of fat tissue ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews.
Visibly reduces the lumps and dimples under the skin, effectively overcome stubborn fat cells and cellulite.
Lifts and Firms the skin.
Innovative ingredients energize the skin, Improve blood circulation in order to tighten and firm the skin.
Reshape the body and tighten curve.
Pregnant woman do not to use it. Skin allergy or wound should use it with caution
Keep warm. avoid damp.avoid injuries. quit smoking and avoid overwork is necessary
Please avoid overwork and stand long time. As that will make the blood circulation not smooth. Raise up your legs regularly will promote the blood circulation.
Be relax and good mentality is needed. Avoid strong nerve
Review of the Mechanisms and Effects of Noninvasive Body Contouring Devices on Cellulite and Subcutaneous Fat
Today, ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews different kinds of non-invasive body contouring modalities, including cryolipolysis, radiofrequency (RF), low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are available for reducing the volume of subcutaneous adipose tissue or cellulite. Each procedure has distinct mechanisms for stimulating apoptosis or necrosis adipose tissue.
In addition to the mentioned techniques, some investigations are underway for analyzing the efficacy of other techniques such as whole body vibration (WBV) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). In the present review the mechanisms, effects and side effects of the mentioned methods have been discussed. The effect of these devices on cellulite or subcutaneous fat reduction has been assessed.
We searched pubmed, ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews google scholar and the cochrane databases for systemic reviews, review articles, meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials up to February 2015. The keywords were subcutaneous fat, cellulite, obesity, noninvasive body contouring, cryolipolysis, RF, LLLT, HIFU, ESWT and WBV with full names and abbreviations.
We included seven reviews and 66 original articles in the present narrative review. Most of them were applied on normal weight or overweight participants (body mass index < 30 kg/m2) in both genders with broad range of ages (18 to 50 years on average).
In the original articles, the numbers of included methods were: 10 HIFU, 13 RF, 22 cryolipolysis, 11 LLLT, 5 ESWT and 4 WBV therapies. Six of the articles evaluated combination therapies and seven compared the effects of different devices.
Some of the noninvasive body contouring devices in animal and human studies such as cryolipolysis, RF, LLLT and HIFU showed statistical significant effects on body contouring, removing unwanted fat and cellulite in some body areas.
However, ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews the clinical effects are mild to moderate, for example 2 – 4 cm circumference reduction as a sign of subcutaneous fat reduction during total treatment sessions. Overall, there is no definitive noninvasive treatment method for cellulite. Additionally, due to the methodological differences in the existing evidence, comparing the techniques is difficult.
In the recent years, noninvasive body contouring techniques have become one of the most widespread procedures and are growing fast in areas of esthetic medicine. The vast majority of surgical body contouring methods has inherent risks and complications such as pain, swelling, prolonged recovery, scarring, hematoma or infection, which make noninvasive procedures increasingly popular.
According to reported data by the American society for aesthetic plastic surgery in 2013, the significant risk of invasive body contouring procedures has led to 521% growth of noninvasive techniques since 1997. In addition, it has been estimated that noninvasive body-contouring procedures are growing 21% annualy. Even for shortening postoperative recovery, decreasing bruising and more skin tightening, surgical lipectomy techniques are combined with noninvasive methods
Cellulite is a skin discomfort developed by multiple factors but the main etiology is not completely understood. The appearance of skin changes and it becomes like an “orange peel”. Cellulite is commonly found on the thighs and buttocks. Cellulite ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews is more common in adult females than males. Up to 98% of females are concerned about their skin changes due to cellulite and the changes decrease their self-esteem.
The Nurnberger and Muller scale is the most commonly used classification for cellulite. According to this scale, three grades were defined: I- visible changes with skin clamping or muscle contraction; II- visible changes without manipulation; and III- visible changes associated with nodules.
In addition to Nurnberger and Muller grading-score, recent classification includes four additional variables: (i) the number of evident depressions; (ii) the depth of visible depressions; (iii) appearance alterations of skin surface and (iv) laxity grade. According to these items, cellulite is classified with three degrees: mild, moderate and severe.
Estimating accurate results of anti-cellulite therapies is not easy but there are some practical methods for measuring the outcomes such as real-time scanning ultrasound image, three-dimensional optical skin surface measurement, clinical photographing, histological findings, personal questionnaires, etc).
Subcutaneous fat is different from cellulite. As mentioned before, cellulite is defined by focused and topographic skin changes with an orange-peel look, yet subcutaneous fat is an indicator of peripheral fat mass, which could be evaluated by circumference and skin fold measurements and variation in these parameters could be considered as an indicator of cellulite changes.
However, other cellulite indices such as skin elasticity and dermal thickness should be considered besides these measurements.
In the past, different methods of body contouring were assessed in order to specify their safety and influence on subcutaneous fat reduction and the treatment of cellulite. Patient satisfaction in the short-term and medium-term, durability of the results and time to obtain maximum outcomes, common complication and recovery time were considered in these studies.
The objectives of this paper were to review and evaluate prominent methods on noninvasive subcutaneous fat removal and improvement of cellulite and comparing their clinical results. Since, there is physiological and biochemical diversity between subcutaneous fat tissue and cellulite, both were included in the review.
Ultraslim ultrasonic cellulite remover reviews – HOME PAGE